<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Adam Loving&#039;s Blog &#187; Social Networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamloving.com/tag/social-networking/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamloving.com</link>
	<description>Seattle Social Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:07:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why I really, really love Instagram</title>
		<link>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/photo-sharing</link>
		<comments>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/photo-sharing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 17:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Loving</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Projects, Programming, Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamloving.com/?p=971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rant against filtering photos is like a musician who calls Garage Band an unworthy tool for making music. One person's art killer is another person's art enabler. Creating and sharing are two huge forces for good, so shut up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I had to laugh a couple days ago when I saw a blog post entitled &#8220;<a href="http://seldo.com/weblog/2010/11/03/why_i_really_really_hate_instagram ">Why I really, really hate Instagram</a>.&#8221; Instagram is very simple iPhone photo sharing app. Before you upload your photo, you can apply an image filter to give it a retro or artistic look. The author hates Instagram because it encourages the use of photographic filters to &#8220;destroy&#8221; the image quality of your photos (by removing digital information from them).</p>
<p>While I understand the author&#8217;s point from a technical perspective &#8211; I believe his angst (&#8220;Stop deliberately destroying your own memories.&#8221;) is completely misplaced.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-973" title="Instagram Sample" src="http://adamloving.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/photo.png" alt="" width="320" height="480" /></p>
<p>I love Instagram because it motivates me to take more pictures. I think the artistic degradation makes it safer to experiment and take photos of mundane things, while cultivating an artistic eye. I&#8217;m not trying and be a professional photographer. This is artistic expression (and memories) I wouldn&#8217;t have otherwise had. For me, more pictures (even crappy ones) are better than fewer pictures.</p>
<p>Knowing that some small audience is looking at the photos I take is also a huge motivator. To an extent the &#8220;Internet famous&#8221; dynamic is at play (I get an emotional boost when people like my pics), but also a small app like this creates an important social contract among its users. You know what you post will be public. You know it is OK to experiment creatively. And importantly, your audience knows what to expect. You don&#8217;t have to ask yourself all the questions you ask yourself before you share a photo on Facebook. I imagine this is why some people have loved flickr for years.</p>
<p>The rant against filtering photos is like a musician who calls Garage Band an unworthy tool for making music. One person&#8217;s art killer is another person&#8217;s art enabler. Creating and sharing are two huge forces for good, so shut up.</p>
<div>You can find me on Instagram as <a href="http://instagr.am/p/JTHx/">adamloving</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/photo-sharing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Friend Connect = OpenSocial Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/google-friend-connect-opensocial-everywhere</link>
		<comments>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/google-friend-connect-opensocial-everywhere#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Loving</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Projects, Programming, Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friend Connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensocial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamloving.com/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia The race between OpenSocial and the Facebook Platform is hard to call. Facebook has better technology, and a growing user base &#8211; but OpenSocial has the support of MySpace and LinkedIn. A few weeks back, Google announced Friend Connect, and I don&#8217;t think it got the coverage it deserved. Maybe I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; float: right; display: block;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Googleplex_Welcome_Sign.jpg"><img style="border: medium none; display: block;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ee/Googleplex_Welcome_Sign.jpg/202px-Googleplex_Welcome_Sign.jpg" alt="Sign at the Googleplex" /></a></p>
<p class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Googleplex_Welcome_Sign.jpg" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a></p>
</div>
<p>The race between <a class="zem_slink" title="OpenSocial" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSocial">OpenSocial</a> and the Facebook Platform is hard to call. Facebook has better technology, and a growing user base &#8211; but OpenSocial has the support of <a class="zem_slink" title="MySpace" rel="homepage" href="http://www.myspace.com/">MySpace</a> and LinkedIn.</p>
<p>A few weeks back, Google announced <a href="http://blog.go2web20.net/2008/06/testing-google-friend-connect-1-2-3.html">Friend Connect</a>, and I don&#8217;t think it got the coverage it deserved. Maybe I was just on vacation. I think Friend Connect more than anything else gives OpenSocial a leg up. Friend Connect will let you turn any Web site into an OpenSocial Web site by <em>adding some javascript</em>. Facebook&#8217;s relase of fbOpen serves the same purpose, but will never be adopted as widely.</p>
<p>I was a big fan of <a class="zem_slink" title="MyBlogLog" rel="homepage" href="http://www.mybloglog.com">MyBlogLog</a> (the idea and virality at least, if not the implementation). I think Friend Connect is going to be what puts OpenSocial over the top. As if Google hadn&#8217;t taken over my life enough already.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/0695f5db-40ff-489c-80dd-09e432e0d0f9/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=0695f5db-40ff-489c-80dd-09e432e0d0f9" alt="Zemanta Pixie" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/google-friend-connect-opensocial-everywhere/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

