<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Adam Loving&#039;s Blog &#187; Friend Connect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamloving.com/tag/friend-connect/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamloving.com</link>
	<description>Seattle social web developer and marketing hacker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What is the big whoop about Facebook Friend Connect?</title>
		<link>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/facebook-friend-connect</link>
		<comments>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/facebook-friend-connect#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Loving</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Projects, Programming, Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friend Connect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamloving.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image by Abdallah ♫ via Flickr I don&#8217;t understand how Facebook&#8217;s new Friend Connect is substantively different from their pre-platform API functionality. External Web sites already have the ability to allow users to sign in to Facebook and retrieve their friends and profile from an external site. Friend connect just appears to be some better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; float: right; display: block;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/8863373@N04/2698850286/"><img style="border: medium none; display: block;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3128/2698850286_1e2ffdc06a_m.jpg" alt="Hotel Larabeach" /></a><span class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/8863373@N04/2698850286/">Abdallah ♫</a> via Flickr</span></div>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand how Facebook&#8217;s new Friend Connect is substantively different from their pre-platform API functionality. External Web sites already have the ability to allow users to sign in to Facebook and retrieve their friends and profile from an external site. Friend connect just appears to be some better UI controls for doing this withouth having to jump off to Facebook and approve the 3rd party app. What am I missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/facebook-friend-connect/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog, twit, or regurgitate?</title>
		<link>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/blog-twit-or-regurgitate</link>
		<comments>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/blog-twit-or-regurgitate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Loving</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Projects, Programming, Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friend Connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FriendFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamloving.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image by Getty Images via Daylife Steve Rubel had an interesting post today about where you should invest your time &#8220;contributing&#8221; online. Micro Persuasion: Should You Rent or Buy Social Real Estate? &#8220;Renting&#8221; in this context means participating in discussion on someone else&#8217;s site (like Twitter). &#8220;Owning&#8221; means collecting content on your own domain (or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; float: right; display: block;"><a href="http://www.daylife.com/image/00G5bkT3D71bM"><img style="border: medium none; display: block;" src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/00G5bkT3D71bM/150x100.jpg" alt="MOUTAIN VIEW, CA - MAY 4:  Employees of Google listen to a town hall meeting lead by Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and Google CEO Eric Schmidt (R) at Google May 4, 2007 in Mountain View, California. McCain took part in the town hall meeting on the Google campus after taking a tour of the internet giant's facilities.  (Photo by David Paul Morris/Getty Images)" /></a></p>
<p class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image by <a href="http://www.daylife.com/source/Getty_Images">Getty Images</a> via <a href="http://www.daylife.com">Daylife</a></p>
</div>
<p>Steve Rubel had an interesting post today about where you should invest your time &#8220;contributing&#8221; online.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2008/06/online-equity-s.html">Micro Persuasion: Should You Rent or Buy Social Real Estate?</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Renting&#8221; in this context means participating in discussion on someone else&#8217;s site (like <a class="zem_slink" title="Twitter" rel="homepage" href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>). &#8220;Owning&#8221; means collecting content on your own domain (or blog). From the post:</p>
<blockquote><p>It seems to me like &#8220;renting&#8221; online equity is now what&#8217;s in vogue. Long-form blogging is less prevalent because the competition for attention from pro-bloggers is steep. That&#8217;s why I love the <a class="zem_slink" title="FriendFeed" rel="homepage" href="http://friendfeed.com">Friendfeed</a> model. It&#8217;s like a co-op. I can invest in my blog and realize benefits not only here but also on Friendfeed. Or, I can invest in Twitter and see the same return on Friendfeed, though certain provisions apply. You&#8217;re still beholden to the landlord.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think <a class="zem_slink" title="MyBlogLog" rel="homepage" href="http://www.mybloglog.com">MyBlogLog</a> had the potential to be a better example than FriendFeed. I&#8217;m still enamoured with the idea, and am eagerly awating Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.google.com/friendconnect/">Friend Connect</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/blog-twit-or-regurgitate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Friend Connect = OpenSocial Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/google-friend-connect-opensocial-everywhere</link>
		<comments>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/google-friend-connect-opensocial-everywhere#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Loving</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Projects, Programming, Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friend Connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensocial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamloving.com/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia The race between OpenSocial and the Facebook Platform is hard to call. Facebook has better technology, and a growing user base &#8211; but OpenSocial has the support of MySpace and LinkedIn. A few weeks back, Google announced Friend Connect, and I don&#8217;t think it got the coverage it deserved. Maybe I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; float: right; display: block;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Googleplex_Welcome_Sign.jpg"><img style="border: medium none; display: block;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ee/Googleplex_Welcome_Sign.jpg/202px-Googleplex_Welcome_Sign.jpg" alt="Sign at the Googleplex" /></a></p>
<p class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Googleplex_Welcome_Sign.jpg" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a></p>
</div>
<p>The race between <a class="zem_slink" title="OpenSocial" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSocial">OpenSocial</a> and the Facebook Platform is hard to call. Facebook has better technology, and a growing user base &#8211; but OpenSocial has the support of <a class="zem_slink" title="MySpace" rel="homepage" href="http://www.myspace.com/">MySpace</a> and LinkedIn.</p>
<p>A few weeks back, Google announced <a href="http://blog.go2web20.net/2008/06/testing-google-friend-connect-1-2-3.html">Friend Connect</a>, and I don&#8217;t think it got the coverage it deserved. Maybe I was just on vacation. I think Friend Connect more than anything else gives OpenSocial a leg up. Friend Connect will let you turn any Web site into an OpenSocial Web site by <em>adding some javascript</em>. Facebook&#8217;s relase of fbOpen serves the same purpose, but will never be adopted as widely.</p>
<p>I was a big fan of <a class="zem_slink" title="MyBlogLog" rel="homepage" href="http://www.mybloglog.com">MyBlogLog</a> (the idea and virality at least, if not the implementation). I think Friend Connect is going to be what puts OpenSocial over the top. As if Google hadn&#8217;t taken over my life enough already.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/0695f5db-40ff-489c-80dd-09e432e0d0f9/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=0695f5db-40ff-489c-80dd-09e432e0d0f9" alt="Zemanta Pixie" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adamloving.com/internet-programming/google-friend-connect-opensocial-everywhere/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

